The point of view Lorrie Moore uses in How to Become a Writer gives the
story a very sporadic read. The point of view that is used creates an uncommon
tension. The tension that is created is between the narrator, Francie, and the
other people in the story. The story would also be completely different if
another point of view was used. The story may have flowed better but the story
would have become dull.
The narrator is telling the reader
about her life and experiences. With this point of view the story becomes more
personal and relatable. The narrator talks in such a way as if she is talking
directly to the reader. She uses phrases like, “In your high school…” or “Your
mother will come visit you…” (148). With a quick read it can be seen that the
narrator is talk another person about their experiences, when in reality she is
talking about herself in a sarcastic tone.
The tension that is seen in the
story because of this point of view is between the narrator and her
classmates/teachers, herself and her mother. In multiple parts throughout the
story, it is seen that the narrator’s classmates and teachers either disapprove
or don’t care for how she writes. Francie turns a report into her teacher and
this is his response, “Some of your images are quite nice, but you have no
sense of plot.” (148). Later while she was at college her classmates responded
similarly to her high school teacher. The classmates would say, “Much of your
writing is smooth and energetic. You have, however, a ludicrous notion of
plot.” The students respond in “its good but not”. In one case the narrator
said, “After class someone asks you if you are crazy.” (149). After this, the
narrator says, “Decide that perhaps you should stick to comedies.”(149). This
shows that the narrator was being affected by all the comments she received
about her writing making her question herself. There was even tension between
Francie and her mother. Her mother tells her, “Francie Francie, remember when
you were going to be a child psychology major?” (151). Her own mother was
slightly disappointed that she was so focused on writing. However this didn’t
stop Francie from continuing her writing.
The story would have been a complete
opposite if it was written in the perspective of the common disconnected
narrator. The story would have turned into a biography about the struggles
Francie faced to be a writer. The story would have definitely flowed much
smoother and would not be as random and sporadic. This point of view keeps you
reading because it is like a bunch of shorter stories in the short story.
You are right it did feel like the narrator was pretty random, sporadic and essentially all over the place. I also agree that she was being affected by all the comments; in a way it kind of showed the struggles a so called becoming writer faces. The point of view is intriguing because like you pointed out, it is as if you are reading a bunch of stories. Personally i think partly the reason is because it seems as if the narrator is disclosing events from a span of about 5 or 7 years in her life all bunched together in one thought. You made some pretty good points that made me think a little more about the story. nice post
ReplyDelete